June 26, 2008

Bartle Is Right

The Internet at large is going blah, blah, blah as of late due to a wonderful quote from a man that a lot of MMO veterans have long argued is our "intellectual elite". That man is none other than Dr. Bartle, and here is the bomb he tossed:
Massively: "Are you planning on playing games like Age of Conan and Warhammer when they come out?"
Bartle: "I’ve already played Warhammer. It was called World of Warcraft."
I've railed against the WoW vs WAR comparisons before and completely blistered idiots trying to compare the two based on visuals, but Bartle's comment is not comparing the two. I think Dr. Bartle is 100% correct in what he said. He HAS played WAR already and it WAS called World of Warcraft.

Now, why would I go and say this after arguing until blue in the face that WAR is not WoW? Because of something I've said a hundred times before: players looking for the WoW experience will find it in WAR. All that is WoW can be found in WAR. The defining difference is that there will be a hell of a lot more to WAR than there is currently or will ever be to WoW.

That is not a slight against WoW, it is a statement of fact that Blizzard is the kind of developer that sticks strictly to what they can do right. PvE and all this dabbling in e-sports is right up Blizzard's ally and that is what WoW will always be. The question for WoW has been whether e-sport and PvE can coexist in the same game.

So, Bartle is right. He has played WAR already, because he is an Achiever by his own test. He has three level 70 characters in WoW. I have no doubt he could do the same when WAR launches, but I do not see Bartle ever hitting Realm Rank 80 (the true "end" level in WAR). Just as I doubt Bartle would ever achieve a 2000+ personal Arena rating on his level 70 WoW characters.

Even if Bartle talks better with a backspace key, I doubt he would remove his quote. For him, the experience to be gained in WAR for HIM is the exact same experience he got out of WoW.

To me that is more evidence that WAR is going to be a great game. The complete WoW experience is there, and everyone looking for it will find it. Funny thing is, a lot of these same people will also find out that WAR is fleshed out, full-featured, and actually encourages players to socialize at every turn.

And Cuppy, Bartle's statement was foolish, because as the industry veteran he is, he knew damn well how it would be taken and I think to a certain degree he wanted it to be taken that way. Foolish, his statement was, but wrong it was not. He has already stated he would shut down WoW, so it is of no surprise that a game that will deliver the same quality experience of WoW would be on his hit list as well. Smart people do say stupid things.

5 comments:

sid67 said...

Bartle might be right but that doesn’t make him RIGHT. I think it’s hilarious how people ascribe all this profound meaning to some of his comments and ideas despite the fact that they are neither new or enlightening ideas. I’m all for innovation and I will rant about MMO stagnation as much as anyone, but saying that two games in the same genre are the same is asinine. A genre becomes popular because people like what it offers them. The fact that games in a genre share common features is what makes it a genre in the first place. Radical change or revolution creates new genres that may or may not be well received. So yes, in the sense that WAR and WoW are in the same genre – he is right. However, that doesn’t meant that evolution or innovation is not taking place within that genre. As you point out, people who LIKE WoW will continue to find WAR very appealing and innovative.

Anonymous said...

I won't attribute any profound meaning here to Dr. Bartle. Instead I will attribute it to Heartless Gamer. I have long been one of the defenders of Warhammer Online. And I certainly do agree that, as Heartless says, if you like WoW you like Warhammer Online. Whether Dr. Bartle is right or wrong it's his opinion. If everyone agreed with everyone else in gaming all the articles would be about is people who sit around agreeing and saying "yup, yup, yup" and nothing else.Yes there are certainly similarities between wow and war. Only a fool would deny it.BUT there are alot of things that War HAS SAID they will have th at WoW will not. (if nothing else I will go for the public quests). Not to mention the wee fact that if Dr. Bartle wanted to get everyone talking about him, he found the perfect way to do it. In fact I think I have changed my mind about the whole thing and will go out to write an article about how much Warhammer Online is like WoW (of course the little fact that it isn't even out yet may hinder valid observations).

Good article Heartless

Julie Whitefeather

Anonymous said...

I won't attribute any profound meaning here to Dr. Bartle. Instead I will attribute it to Heartless Gamer. I have long been one of the defenders of Warhammer Online. And I certainly do agree that, as Heartless says, if you like WoW you like Warhammer Online. Whether Dr. Bartle is right or wrong it's his opinion. If everyone agreed with everyone else in gaming all the articles would be about is people who sit around agreeing and saying "yup, yup, yup" and nothing else.Yes there are certainly similarities between wow and war. Only a fool would deny it.BUT there are alot of things that War HAS SAID they will have th at WoW will not. (if nothing else I will go for the public quests). Not to mention the wee fact that if Dr. Bartle wanted to get everyone talking about him, he found the perfect way to do it. In fact I think I have changed my mind about the whole thing and will go out to write an article about how much Warhammer Online is like WoW (of course the little fact that it isn't even out yet may hinder valid observations).

Good article Heartless

Julie Whitefeather

Keen said...

I agree with you when the comment is put in THIS particular context. However, like Julie Whitefeather, I will not attribute this to Bartle. -- I actually find myself saying "Yup" to you a lot Julie. ;) --

Bottom line: Dismissing a game because it shares similarities with another game of the EXACT SAME GENRE is asinine. Dismissing a game that is so incredibly different despite a few similarities is downright ridiculous and worthy of the label "stupid".

Nice article, Heartless_.

Keen said...

I agree with you when the comment is put in THIS particular context. However, like Julie Whitefeather, I will not attribute this to Bartle. -- I actually find myself saying "Yup" to you a lot Julie. ;) --

Bottom line: Dismissing a game because it shares similarities with another game of the EXACT SAME GENRE is asinine. Dismissing a game that is so incredibly different despite a few similarities is downright ridiculous and worthy of the label "stupid".

Nice article, Heartless_.